Connections

Posts in this category relate to connections – but the connections may not be made obvious in the post.


The Exponential Leap (26 May 2017 viewpoint)


“The Exponential Leap 2017-2027” (also known as “The Leap”) will be a multi-media publication-and-immersive experience. It will be launched at an event called Exponentially Human to be held in 2027. “The Leap” will be developed in such an open and collaborative way that it will have been accessible long before the official launch. But there are benefits in having a deadline, after which no more contributions will be accepted. The deadline is the party at the end of the Exponentially Human event.

The Leap will look at a fracture point that occurs between two different global “realities”. Before the fracture point there is the past reality of people’s lives as lived in “the-past-and-the-present” of the times leading up to 2017. After the fracture point is the reality of people’s lives as lived in “the-present-and-the-future” in the time looking forward from 2027.

This fracture point (which in hindsight may appear sudden or gradual) means that by 2027 things will “be different”. It will be obvious to (almost) everyone that there is no way to go back to the way things were in 2017, including some of the mindsets and institutional norms of the period.

For some people their experience of The Leap may be compared to the experience of a heavy thunderstorm.  In the time building up to the storm there is a heaviness, and darkening, and a physical feeling of pressure. Then the storm finally breaks (and people have different feelings about the experience of violent storms with their thunder, lightning and downpours).  After the storm there may be a physical sensation of less pressure in the atmosphere and a sense of freshness (although irreparable damage may also have been done and will need to be dealt with).  “Before the storm” and “after the storm” are different. So it is with The Leap

Another way of looking at The Leap and our current sensitivities to it, is to compare it to an earthquake, with its foreshocks and aftershocks. According to WikiPedia “A foreshock is an earthquake that occurs before a larger seismic event (the mainshock) and is related to it in both time and space. The designation of an earthquake as foreshock, mainshock or aftershock is only possible after the full sequence of events has happened.”

If The Leap is seen like the disturbance of a major earthquake then some of the events and disturbances that people are experiencing today may be seen as foreshocks. These “foreshock” events and disturbances may be better understood later, after The Leap has happened. Then the interconnections between all the “foreshock disturbances” will become obvious.

There are many implications of The Leap, and at the Exponentially Human 2027 conference there will be much debate about exactly when The Leap began, exactly when the fracture happened, how much of The Leap is completed, and how much it is an ongoing process.

After the fracture point of “The Leap” has happened some people will still be in denial. They will be trying to construct a version of reality that fits their view of the past-and-the-present, as if there had been no fracture point.  Some people who are “off-grid”, regarding various ways the world works in 2017 and later, won’t be so aware of the shifts and fracture point of The Leap although its effects will ripple out to them.

“The Exponential Leap 2017-2027” will be officially launched and celebrated at the closing party of an event called Exponentially Human 2027.  In my imagination the publication and the event are already real. If you understand and believe the  William Gibson quote “The future is already here, it’s just unevenly distributed” then you’re probably already seeing evidence of The Leap and the elements of the 2027 celebration.

Some of my friends have joined me in setting the date aside (September 16th -18th 2027). You may like to do the same. Maybe, if some of the trans-humanists  are right, I’ll have an enhanced exoskeleton or something by then to help me wear my years lightly and bop with the best of you.

May 26, 2017 by pamela | Categories: Connections | Tags: , , , , ,


Be encouraged – the good stuff is starting to come together.


So much is going on. How it all connects will become obvious later.

It is all “good stuff” – and I can’t justify that statement either – but I know all the people involved, and I know how what they do impacts on my life – and, in my judgement, it’s all good.

Things I’m learning

Thanks to David Bovill I’m:

  • Working with Ward Cunningham and others on the development of the Federated Wiki.
  • Learning about community radio
  • Working with Mark Leighton to produce a radio programme
  • Developing skills in collecting content via WhatsApp in collaboration with my friends John Dada, Gbade Adejumo, Elfneh Bariso and David Mutua

Sharing what I’m learning / have learned

Teal

I was active in the Teal for Startups group and it’s time for us to give feedback – i.e written contributions on “My Journey with Teal”

Before I Die Network

Over the past couple of years I’ve been along to several of Olivia Comberti’s “Before I Die Network” workshops and I’m always encouraged and energised by them. This month Olivia’s invited me along as her guest speaker. It’s quite a responsibility as it means finding a way to share my story in a way that will help to encourage and energise others.

Lunch and Learn

Satalia is a company I want to know more about. I’m interested in what they do (related to Artificial Intelligence) and how they do it (flat organsational structure and sharing what they do in transparent, open ways).  I’ve been invited along to speak at one of their Friday “Lunch and Learn” sessions. I see this as an opportunity for me to learn. I’m going to learn most about our overlapping interests during the Q and A part, so I need to make sure that what I say beforehand stimulates the questions that will teach me most.

Speakeasy

Stuart Benson is the man behind Speakeasy at the Canvas cafe – see his tweet below:

I met Stuart a few weeks ago  – I’m not sure when but it was while the winter festival ball pit was open in the Happiness Museum (which is behind the Canvas Cafe and one of the reasons I happened to be there).

Anyhow, what happened next is another story but the outcome is that I’m going to speak there sometime.  I’m not sure if I’ll tell a happy story or a sad one. I’m thinking of one which is still unfinished – it has tragedy in it (and humour). It could be heading for a happy ending, or a sad one, depending on what the audience choose to do with it.

Here is Stuart’s invitation

He’s wearing the Alternative Value badge that I awarded him (in case you can’t see it clearly it’s also the website logo).

Connections and visibility

As I said at the start- it’s all connected, and it’s all good.

It’s hard to explain how – but it’s getting easier to demonstrate. The connections are getting more visible. Expect to see more.

 

Apr 09, 2017 by pamela | Categories: Connections | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Submarine – the ultimate challenge for flat organisational structures


An enjoyable brief introduction to the ideas of flat organisational structures (explored elsewhere on this site and tagged “holacracy” and “teal”). It’s both light-hearted and serious – if you can do this on a submarine – you can do it anywhere.

This animation is relevant to FASST – Freedom, Accountability and Structure for Systemic Transformation. It was was adapted from Captain David Marquet’s talk on Greatness, and is based on his book, Turn the Ship Around!

Mar 13, 2017 by pamela | Categories: Connections | Tags: , , ,


The “=Value” logo and buttons


The Dadamac Connect logo (the V with two lines through it) is a symbol for non-financial Value.

A few years ago Nikki Fishman and I were doing a diagram, for our own benefit, showing flows of money,”physical stuff” information, ideas etc within our network.  We were putting “£” signs for money, light bulbs for ideas, “i” for information and so on to help us see what was happening. We realised there was something of value that we hadn’t captured on the diagram. We knew it was there, and it was valuable, but we didn’t know what kind of a symbol to choose for it.

Perhaps what we were trying to capture was all to do with social capital, but I think it was wider than that. Certainly it included social capital and was often to do with the development of strong relationships and trust that had been built up over time. It also included knowledge, a kind of knowledge that was much more than mere “information”.

We decided to put a “V” for value, where ever we recognised this special extra something. It seemed natural to put  the “=” sign through the “V”, a bit like the lines through the letters that stand for dollar, pound and so on. It showed we meant more that just an initial letter. We were emphasising an alternative, non-financial way, to recognise value.

Later it became a coin shaped logo, and a button with the web address on it.

If I fall into conversation with someone who does “really get it” about Alternative Value then I give them a button, to help them share the idea. I’ve made a couple of mistakes giving value buttons, but on the whole if you do see the button, you’ll be seeing someone who understands what it represents. Ask the wearer how/why they got the button. Chances are you’ll hear some interesting stories about people working on things that are of great value, but are not easily matched to any measurement of financial value or reward.

I try to always have a couple of extra buttons with me in case I meet someone who understands what is meant by Alternative Value. If you think you’d be a good person to be wearing a Value button, and our paths cross, please come and introduce yourself and tell me more.

 

Jan 30, 2017 by pamela | Categories: Connections


December 11th FASST update


Dear FASST friends. FASST has moved on during 2016, so I’m getting a few things in writing before the end of the year.

FASST (Freedom, Accountability and Structure for Systemic Transformation) is an “experiment in collaboration”. It is an emergent organisation, and its shape is becoming clearer as more of my friends and contacts join me in the exploration of what it is and what it may become. (FASST’s story to date can be found in the archives of this site.)

Some of the current investigatory questions behind FASST are

  • How can the example of Open Source Software development be applied in other, less structured, situations where people are collaborating with each other?
  • How far can the model of Holacracy be applied to FASST (an emerging organisation where people are working on things that are not necessarily their paid work, and they are collaborating with each other in a very “light touch” kind of way)?
  • How does the FASST experiment fit with the ideas of a shift from competition to collaboration in some business contexts and elsewhere?
  • How does FASST relate to “Exponentially Human” and other connected ideas and developments?

People and FASST

FASST is about people I know, and how we (and others) can collaborate more effectively. To me FASST is currently about discovering how “people with a purpose” (relating to some kind of systemic transformation) working with maximum individual freedom, can support each other in some way, enabled through effective structures and clear accountabilities.

As FASST becomes a reality I’m recognising different ways that I’m mentally categorising people regarding their relationship to FASST:

1 – The FASST core group

These are people who are interested in “how FASST works”. Their main interest in FASST is in its “operating system”.  People in the FASST core group are interested in the development of structures and procedures that will enable FASST to do the kind of collaborations it wants to do in an effective way.

2 – FASST people

These people are doing something “collaborative” with me (possibly something as simple as having “buddy” conversations to help each other along). They have agreed that I can think of our shared activity as coming within the boundary of FASST.  They are accepting of my interest in analysing what we are doing together, and the “value” that we get from it.

The ways that we behave together “in FASST” is helping me to define “FASST culture”. Our small collaborations help me to see patterns and possibilities for FASST procedures and structures.

3 – People who who are interested in FASST, but are on the edge of it

These people are a bit like lurkers in an online group. They have some interest, but are not actively involved. The fact that they are “on the edge” (neither in nor out) helps me to see where the current boundary of FASST is.

4 – People outside its boundary

Beyond the boundary of FASST is “the environment in which FASST operates” – the wider world, where people have no connections with FASST.

There are some people in that wider environment however who do contribute informally, and incidentally, to FASST. That happens when we explore ideas and thus I gain new perspectives on things relevant to FASST. However I don’t talk to them about FASST itself, because they have let me know, implicitly or explicitly that their interests lie elsewhere.

FASST and Enspiral similarities

I’m interested in organisational structures that are emerging in rapidly changing and interconnected world. In that context I’m interested in organisational similarities and differences between FASST and Espiral.

Organisationally there are similarities. FASST has the “FASST core group”, and “FASST people” while Enspiral has foundation members (at the core of the organisation) and contributors – see People Agreement. Regarding “people who are interested”, there are people who are not actively involved in Enspiral, but attend events.

Enspiral is much bigger, than FASST.

Enspiral is well established, and is a network of social enterprise ventures and social entrepreneurs working together with shared vision and values. It has a business model that is working. FASST has a long-term model for financial sustainability for itself and its people, but it is an unconventional model, with several stages of development (I will write about that elsewhere). At this stage it is simplest to think of FASST as a collaborative community, of value to its people, but not generating revenue for them, and not providing services for people outside.

In October I attended an Enspiral workshop in London called “Open Enspiral: Working in a Participatory Organisation. The details (my highlights) said –

Enspiral is a bold experiment in participation by design. The organisation uses the tools of business to create positive social impact and develop software and practices for non-hierarchical, open and participatory working cultures.

Ways of working are prioritised so people can focus their energies on what is most meaningful to them. This is a half-day workshop where we cover a set of five modules on these standard business concepts:

Money: How do you democratically fund a community? 

Decisions: How can you come to consensus with 300 people and not sit in long meetings?

Management: How do you hold accountability and support in an organisation without managers?

Leadership: How might distributed leadership actually work?

Governance: How do you enact governance in a participatory network?

Enspiral’s home page says  “More people working on stuff that matters – Powerful things take place when like minded people connect.”

I came away inspired by Enspiral and with useful insights about FASST’s organisational structure. I also recognised structural similarities with other emerging organisations that I know.

Recognising the importance of the “core group”

The issue of the “core group” is important, especially where organisations are trying to grow with flat organisational structures (as being explored by the Teal for Startups group). In flat organisations there is a need for some group or individual to curate the structure and “DNA” of the organisation – see Us and “Networks as a driver of system change?” by Catherine Howe

Using “enspiral” and “inspiral” as generic terms

I like the idea of a generic term for organisations which are structured with the three elements of

  1. People around the boundary in some way
  2. Others actively involved
  3. A core with additional responsibility

Rather than dream up a new word I’ll adopt my friend Dil’s suggestion. Pointing to the examples of “hoovers” for vacuum cleaners, and “biros” for ball point pens, he suggests calling these organisations “enspirals”. However, given the original Enspiral is for people doing paid work I’m cautious about applying the term “enspiral” to organisations where there is no initial economic connection between the people and the work they are doing together. Where the three part structure exists, but people are inspired to collaborate for some other reason, without the complication of money changing hands. I’m going to change the initial letter and call the organisation an “inspiral”.

Organisationally FASST is…

At time of writing FASST is an “Inspiral” (with the three part structure described above).

Because it is an “inspiral” its costs are minimal.

People are involved because they see value in being part of FASST.

Financially they cover their own costs.

It is similar to a network, but more formal.

(A network is like an extended family, in that it is hard to say where it begins or ends. People who are in FASST are here through agreement.)

FASST deals with immaterial things like ideas, information, mutual support, and new insights.

Where it generates new ideas, knowledge, insights etc anyone in the group can use them – but not in any way that would prevent other people in the group from using them as well.

The ethos of FASST is one of openness and contributing to an “information commons”.

As an inspiral, at this stage of development, FASST has no need for a formal business plan or model of financial sustainability, because it’s not dealing with

goods or services that are for sale, nor with physical objects.

If it moves into creating financial opportunities for its people, or it gets involved in any kind of financial transactions, then it will need to reorganise itself.

We can expect that its shape will shift in some ways during 2017 – but this is where we are now.

Dec 11, 2016 by pamela | Categories: Connections | Tags: , , ,






1 2 3 17